Skip to content
Looking for HR software built for US teams?Visit our US site
WalnutsHR is now live in Canada — try Pro free for 30 days. Start free
Skip to content
walnutsHR

Annual performance review

A structured annual performance review with achievements, competency ratings, goals, and growth areas. Built for managers who want a substantive conversation, not a checkbox.

Live documentReviewed for Ontario

Annual Performance Review

· Period:

Employee: · Role: · Manager:

1. Key achievements

2. Impact

3. Competencies

Execution:

Collaboration:

Craft / technical:

Ownership:

4. Growth areas

Page 1 of 3

5. Goals for the next period

6. Overall summary

7. Employee self-assessment

Page 2 of 3

 Manager
Name
 Date
 Employee
Name
 Date

Made with WalnutsHR Paper · Reviewed for Ontario · April 2026

Page 3 of 3

No compliance hints for this jurisdiction yet — your document looks good for the basics. Have a lawyer review before sending anything consequential.

About this template

An annual performance review is the formal record of how an employee performed against expectations over a year. It feeds compensation decisions, growth plans, and — when things go wrong — the documentary trail a tribunal will read. Done thoughtfully, it's also one of the highest-leverage management conversations of the year.

When to use it

  • You're running an annual or semi-annual review cycle and need a consistent template across the team.
  • You're documenting an employee's performance for a compensation, promotion, or development decision.
  • You want to anchor the next year's goals in a written record both parties signed off on.

What to include

  • Specific achievements — what got done, with numbers wherever possible.
  • Impact — how that work moved the team or the business.
  • Competency ratings on a small set of dimensions you actually assess (most companies use 4–6).
  • Growth areas tied to specific behaviours, not personality traits.
  • Goals for the next period: specific, measurable, time-bound.
  • An overall summary that is honest about both strengths and gaps.
  • Space for the employee to record their own perspective.

Frequently asked questions

Should I tie compensation to the review?

Most companies do, and that's fine — but separate the conversations in time. Mixing "here's how you did" with "here's your raise" in the same meeting is shown empirically to make the development conversation worse: people stop listening to feedback the moment they hear a number.

How do I handle a review for an employee on a PIP?

Document the PIP separately and reference it in the review. Don't paper over performance issues in the annual review — but also don't surface anything in the review that wasn't already raised contemporaneously. Surprises in an annual review are a procedural-fairness problem.

Is the employee allowed to disagree with the review?

Yes. Most well-run companies require employees to sign as acknowledgement, with explicit space for a written response. The employee's response becomes part of the file and signals to future reviewers (and tribunals) that there was a genuine two-way conversation.

Legal disclaimer. Performance reviews are admissible evidence. Generic, uniformly-positive reviews followed by a for-cause termination are commonly used in court to undermine the employer's later claim that the employee was a problem. If a review is honest about gaps, it should also be paired with concrete support — coaching, training, a PIP — so the documentary record shows the employer behaved reasonably.

Save it. Brand it. Sign it.

Sign up free to save your templates, brand them with your logo, and send for e-signature — all from your WalnutsHR dashboard.

Your primary HR database is hosted in a Canadian region. Subprocessors and cross-border processing are disclosed in our privacy policy.

30-day free trial · No credit card required